(Image generated by copilot)
If you have clear goals for the ideal research project, you might think that all you need to do is declare those goals in your assignments and hope your students follow your instructions. This, however, is what we are already doing, and we know that students rarely submit projects that meet our expressed ideals. Disappointment is our constant companion.
The problem with our current less-than-successful approach is that it treats the research project as a product rather than as the result of a process. If we want our students to improve their research abilities it is essential that we focus on training their process.
Here is a perspective for a different approach that is more likely to improve student submissions:
1. When we assign a research project, we can take up a unique opportunity to use the assignment itself to build student research ability, as long as we think of the project as a process to be taught rather than a product to be assessed.
2. The traditional pattern of assigning a project, receiving the final product, and grading it (with comments) measures performance only and assumes that students are learning how to do research by doing research (lots of evidence shows that they don't). With the rise of AI, we have no way to be sure that our students have engaged with the subject matter at all before they submitted the product.
3. Instead we need to view the assignment as a mentoring opportunity. Break the larger project into several segments, ending with a final submission. Use each segment to enlist one or more of your ideal assignment goals, to provide comments on student submissions (comments that focus more on the process than the content), and to allow students to resubmit each segment one or two times in order to improve their work.
For an abundance of resources to guide your students in aspects of the research process, go to https://libguides.twu.ca/ResearchSkills/Home
Slides for Session Two:
The following examples are just that - Examples. They may not reflect your discipline, but hopefully they will give you ideas for turning your stated ideal goals into smaller assignment segments intended to improve student research processes.
Segment One: Research Design and Preliminary Outline
Assignment:
The following guides may help your students:
https://prezi.com/view/yBwgkY19s3TsDk9RjRo8/
https://prezi.com/view/MialHdBOsBkOcAwPMRbN/
Segment Two: Searching for Resources (this might be divided into two segments if you separate book searches from articles or call for searches in more than one database)
Assignment:
https://prezi.com/view/cfXArRA5a1rEAYQJnhYk/
Students will often need help with searching. (Note, for example, that Library OneSearch is the tool for finding books as well as articles). Most of our databases have citation generation tools, often found by clicking on a title in the results. Librarians can offer support here.
In just over 7 minutes, this video walks you through the search functions of Library OneSearch, shows you our research guides, and offers options for formatting citations. [Open to full screen]
https://vimeo.com/754876809/b628c4b80f
Segment Three: Annotation for evaluation
Assignment: Annotate your formatted list of results, stating why each one is of high quality and relevant to your issue.
Segment Four: Final Research Question and Outline
Assignment: Provide a final research question (which you may have revised from the time you first formulated it), a final outline with headings and subheadings, and a final reference list [bibliography] in proper [ ] format.
Segment Five: Submission of the Final, Complete Project
[For tools to help you mentor students in research processes, see this page, which is loaded with tutorials: https://libguides.twu.ca/ResearchSkills]
Land Acknowledgement
Trinity Western University's Langley campus is located on the traditional, ancestral, unceded territory of the Stó:lō people. We are grateful for the opportunity to live, work, and learn on this land.